G2Voice Broadcast #32: Is the Germ Theory based on “fake science? If so, then what DOES cause Dis-ease?
10 AM CST Sunday, April 23
Upcoming Genesis II Church Seminar
It has been one year since we did our last Genesis II Church Seminar in Orange County, California. We will be holding our next G2 Seminar Friday – Sunday, May 19th- 21st at the New Genesis II Chapter 312 Location - Gentry, Arkansas, U.S.A. Please contact Bishop Jonathan by e-mail at:
NOTE: Every attendee needs to be registered by May 9th. Do us all a favor and sign up early. The cut off is at 50 people. Early sigh-up really helps in planning to make an even better G2 Seminar. We will be recording a G2Voice Broadcast also at the seminar.
Following is a letter from our Health Minister where the next seminar will be held!
Wow, Rick Simpson! Awesome! Things are going great here! We've been treating a lot of people and taking a lot of calls. Many people are wanting to come to the seminar who live here locally. I am having them pre-register by emailing you. There are a lot of people who want to come Friday night and give their testimonies! We are very excited about what God is doing in our community.
Amsterdam July 9th-11th More details coming!
Testimonies of the week
#1 Dear Jonathan, I want to tell you that for well over 20 years following my 3rd root canal which caused permanent lymph nodes, on the both sides under my ears to become not just swollen but so engorged, it was always tender. Now have taken MMS for 6 months the lymph nodes are of normal size. Thanks to the persistence of daily MMS for 6 months I am cured.
Now sir, will contact you tomorrow to ask best thing for mild heart attack
brought on by severe stress, just out of hospital this day.
#2 Dr. Butler and Stephanie,
This is the follow-up note that you requested, after my quarterly hygiene appointment at your dental office, yesterday. Was so glad that you could both see the amazing healing and regrowth of my receding gums, after just 90 days of using MMS with DMSO. And no bleeding.... I think you have a year of my previous gum measurements on file to compare to yesterday's results. Feel free to show this data to other patients. It was interesting that when you reviewed my file prior to my visit you had reached the point that you were going to recommend that I begin using hydrogen peroxide, since the year of quarterly cleaning (with laser gum treatment and ozone oil) had not resulted in stopping the bleeding or the gum loss. Contrary to common (ADA) understanding, you have more proof on file now that one can in fact reverse periodontal disease in a very cheap and painless manner. I have attached the latest book on how to use MMS for various conditions. See pages 48-50 on the MMS tooth brushing protocol. For the last 90 days I have been following this format, except I am using a WaterPik. I active 10 drops of MMS with HCL and after 30 seconds add it to a cup of distilled water that is in the WaterPik reservoir. Then I add 10 drops of DMSO and clean the gums. Please read the following to gain an understanding on the chemical properties of MMS and some industries that now use it in their processes and product. EPA approval data is also provided. Be aware the FDA has only approved MMS for water purification purposes and therefore will attack any promotion for "health" uses. I have been with folks that have cured others or have themselves been cured of HIV, HPV, Malaria, Zika, Ebola, EBV, etc. I eliminated a major EBV infection in just in 60 days with it (my pre and post treatment blood tests proved this). George
Is the Germ Theory “fake science”?
Why is this theory so important to understand? Well, first of all, it is believed, as fact, to be the reason we have diseases today! IF this theory is not true then those “industries” that believe it like the medical, pharmaceutical, chemical, agricultural and educational, (I said “educational industries” because it is sponsored by the ones that own the other industries!), don’t have the answer to the question; what causes disease. And IF they don’t know what is causing dis-ease of the body then, why are they seen as “experts”? This theory has been taught for over 150 years in the majority of medical universities worldwide. If this “theory” isn’t true then what is the cause of “dis-ease”? Secondly, if you follow this theory as being true, you will end up not knowing what germs really are and their functions in the body and the world. We need to know how the body really works which in turn will answer the question; why we have dis-ease? There are so many illustrations in nature of the truth about germs or micro-organisms which we will get into later.
First, the “Germ Theory” is a theory not a fact.
So, what is this “germ theory” that is the basis of modern medical procedures and protocols. Here is a VERY good article covering the topic of Germ Theory as well as:
Note: Please read this entire article above. I think you will look at the cause of Dis-ease in a different way.
• Pasteur's Germ Theory of disease causation
“In 1864, French chemist Louis Pasteur fathered "The Science of Bacteriology" and "The Germ Theory of Disease Causation" by demonstrating the existence of various micro-organisms and concluding that these germs cause pathogenic changes in living cultures within the laboratory setting. The germ theory states that diseases are due solely to invasion by specific aggressive micro-organisms. A specific germ is responsible for each disease, and micro-organisms are capable of reproduction and transportation outside of the body. With the germ theory of disease, no longer did we have to take responsibility for sickness caused by our own transgressions of the laws of health. Instead, we blamed germs that invaded the body. The germ theory effectively shifted our personal responsibility for health and well-being onto the shoulders of the medical profession who supposedly knew how to kill off the offending germs. Our own personal health slipped from our control.
• Pasteur Not the Originator of the "Germ Theory"
Actually, the first "Germ Theory of Infectious Disease" was published in 1762 (almost 100 years prior to Pasteur's theory) by a Viennese physician, Dr M. A. Plenciz. In 1860, Louis Pasteur took the credit for the experiments and theory and became identified as its originator. Read the books, Pasteur: Plagiarist, Impostor, by R.B. Pearson, and Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Douglas E. Hume, for all the details. Claude Bernard (1813-1878) disputed the validity of the germ theory and maintained that the general condition of the body is the principal factor in disease, but this idea was largely ignored by the medical profession and the general public. Bernard and Pasteur had many debates on the relative importance of the microbe and the internal environment in which they thrive.
• Pasteur Realizes Mistake
Around 1880, Pasteur himself admitted his mistake. According to Dr Duclaux (one of Pasteur's co-workers), Pasteur discovered that microbial species can undergo many transformations. These facts were not consistent with his germ theory and destroyed its very basis. It is frequently overlooked that around 1880, Pasteur changed his theory. According to Dr Duclaux, Pasteur stated that germs were "ordinarily kept within bounds by natural laws, but when conditions change, when its virulence is exalted, when its host is enfeebled, the germ is able to invade the territory which was previously barred to it." This is the premise that a healthy body is resistant and not susceptible to disease. With the advent of Pasteur's mysterious germ, however, medicine cloaked itself under the guise of 'science' and ever since has succeeded in keeping the public ignorant of the true nature of dis-ease.
• Bacteria and their Symbiotic Role (Sometimes beneficial, sometimes harmful, relationship), in the body.
As a cause of disease, bacteria do not 'invade' the body for they are already present in the digestive tract. As needed bacteria are brought into the circulatory system to aid in the process of purging the physiology of accumulated wastes.
• The Beneficial Role of Bacteria in Disease
Bacteria do not cause the death of the organic matter on which they act, however, as they are a part of the result of dis-ease, not its cause.
Bacteria have an important role to perform in the vital process of healing. Germs take part in virtually all disease phenomena that require the disintegration of refuse and toxic matter within the body which the system is endeavoring to remove. They act as scavengers in clearing up the affected area of toxic saturation. As soon as their role is complete, their numbers decline. It is inappropriate to call bacterial activity an 'attack' or an 'invasion' on the part of germs, unless we mean it is an attack on the toxins.
• Bacteria Mutate According to Decomposing Soil in the Environment
There are no 'disease-producing' bacteria, germs, microbes, bacilli or viruses: it is the environment and the host which deter-mine disease symptoms and the type of bacteria that proliferate. Germs do not cause disease; rather, the body generates disease occasions for the germ proliferation that takes place. In order for a particular germ to exist, it has to have a suitable environment created by the toxic and pathological pollution saturating the body. Systemic poisoning then creates the specific germ culture, depending upon where the body has accumulated the wastes and according to the unhealthful lifestyle habits of the sufferer. The key point is, however, that it is the diseased toxic condition, where the body is overwhelmed with poisonous waste, which creates an environment favorable to the mutation of bacteria into those commonly associated with particular diseases. The disease condition favors proliferation and increasing virulence until their function of devouring toxic debris is accomplished. Germs do not cause disease; rather, the body generates disease occasions for the germ proliferation that takes place. Bacteria do not cause disease; they are present because of it.
• The Toxic Body Produces the Virulent Germ
It is evident, then, that germs do not directly produce disease: rather, the body-generated healing crisis produces the germ by providing a suitable environment where non-toxic bacteria mutate into toxic micro-organisms within septic surroundings. For germs to become dangerous, they must be intermingled with concentrated waste products before a germ metamorphoses into a toxic entity. While it is true that germs and bacteria exist everywhere, the micro-organisms only proliferate in the body when a person develops toxemia, resulting in an unhealthy lifestyle. Colds are actually remedial efforts made necessary by the accumulation in the blood/ lymph, and tissues of unexcreted metabolic waste, and by the intestinal absorption of toxic by-products of indigestion.
• The Body Controls its Bacterial Population
Normal healthy organisms are actually deadly to germs and para-sites and have innate, built-in resources to handle them. Bacteria are helpless against living cells, especially white blood cells and others that compose our natural lines of defense. We harbor countless billions of micro-organisms within our intestinal tract, within our skin, in our mouth, nose and other body cavities. The celebrated Dr. Lewis Thomas, who heads the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute, said: "Pity not the man who has caught bacteria, rather pity the bacteria that was caught by the man. "Humans furnish a very rough environment for bacteria, keeping them tightly restricted and controlled. Lymph nodes, the glandular tissue masses that occur along the lymphatic vessels throughout the body—routinely remove bacteria and foreign particles from the general lymph circulation and supply lymphocytes to the circulatory system. The lymph nodes and spleen form a portion of the body's reticulo endothelial system referring to those phagocytic cells scattered throughout the body which can ingest bacteria, solid particles and other errant cells. This aids in keeping the body in a healthy, stable condition. For example, billions and even trillions of bacteria and fungi are incidentally absorbed from the intestinal tract into the portal blood each day. These are so effectively apprehended and destroyed by our white blood cells and macrophages that scarcely any bacteria or fungi ever enter the circulating blood. Leukocytes (white corpuscles) are the blood's defensive organ-isms that prevent intoxication by bacteria, cooked food debris or other toxic materials. Leukocytosis (an excessive proliferation of white blood cells in the circulation) occurs in response to inflammation, to excessive numbers of bacteria in the body, and to a pre-ponderance of cooked food, all of which represent pathological phenomena. The body must exist in a toxic state before it will institute the disease process. Neither bacteria nor anything else can start and sustain a healing crisis—micro-organisms are incapable of unified action and cannot exist where there is no food (soil) for them to survive. Living healthy cells are not soil for bacteria, but decomposing substances are. If a healthy body can 'catch' a cold or flu due to influenza germs and is unable to resist an 'attack' by these micro-organisms, then how can the subsequently debilitated body ever recover? How can the weakened organism repel the onslaught of trillions of proliferating micro-organisms? The inevitable result would be the death of the organism. If bacteria did invade organisms and subsequently laid them low, as medically supposed, the impetus and momentum they built up in the process would become progressively more pronounced and overwhelming as the organism receded further into disease. If germs and microbe 'attackers' overwhelmed a healthy body, then, once they laid a victim low, their proliferating reproduction would exponentially increase the 'devouring', which would cease only when they had exhausted their food supply. There would be no recovery. If bacteria and viruses cause disease and debilitate the body, how does the weakened individual recover? Were germs the cause of disease, there would be no remission, and germ proliferation would continue unimpeded. Once the invading entities have a head start, it does not seem they would stop their destruction but, instead, would further diminish the organism's ability to defend itself. When bacteria start decomposing a body, only complete exhaustion of all organic materials ends their course only when 'the bones are picked clean', so to speak. Logic tells us that if microbial organisms make someone sick' and proliferate by the billions as they become more numerous and stronger, they would progressively sap more and more energy, vitality and resources from their victim. How can this process be reversed by a more weakened organism? The whole concept of being laid low by microbes and then turning the tables on them makes for good fiction, but is physiologically false. For once dominance is established in nature over a weakened organism, it's downhill from there. Once zebras are overwhelmed by carnivores, they rarely survive. Once bacteria start decomposing organic matter, they continue until their food source is exhausted. The body does not suppress the growth and multiplication of' disease germs' until the morbid toxins on which they subsist have been consumed, and until the inflammatory process has run its course. When diseases are said by medical authorities to be 'limited', this really means the illness is a body detoxification process that is terminated by the body when its purging objectives are reached. The body is in control, and not at the mercy of hordes of microbes or some 'mysterious disease entity'. Disease, once more, is not caused by germs but by the toxic state of the body which allows the germ to flourish. The deranged state of the organism is the outgrowth of violating our biological requirements, and is no chance or haphazard condition. It is this diseased condition that creates an environment favorable to the mutation of bacteria into those associated with specific disease, and to their increasing virulence and proliferation. A state of internal cleanliness, therefore, is essential for health and well-being A pure bloodstream, free unimpeded circulation of all body fluids, and unobstructed excretion generate and maintain healthy tissue Virulent bacteria soon die in this environment for want of suitable nourishment. If the microbe is to have any part in causing disease, it must find an organism that produces suitable soil for its metabolic activities. We cannot avoid germs for they are everywhere. We must be proof against them. We avoid disease only by keeping ourselves in such a state of health that germs are powerless against us.
• Medical Rationale of "Susceptibility" and "Resistance"
Everyone has literally trillions of fungi, bacteria and viruses in their body even when healthy. When physicians are confronted with this, they say that disease is not caused by these agencies because "you are not susceptible' or because "your resistance is high'
This is a cop-out, saying that these agents do not cause dis-ease, but those factors which dispose us to susceptibility do since the word "susceptible" means that the criterion which establishes susceptibility is the actual cause of disease, and not the micro- organism or the agency blamed. This cop-out confirms that the supposed contagious agents; bacteria, viruses and fungi, do not cause disease. The actual cause is whatever causes susceptibility or low resistance. If we maintain our body in a clean, healthy state then germs are irrelevant, for susceptibility does not exist. The concept of susceptibility is really the medical rationale which admits that bacteria only proliferate when the internal physiological condition warrants it. To repeat, it is an admission that an unclean environment is really the cause of disease for if germs were the cause of disease, everyone exposed to the harmful germ would become sick with the same illness. When the condition of susceptibility is introduced into medical theory to describe disease causation, the condition of the host is then of primary importance in the production of disease. Susceptible individuals are those with a high degree of body toxicity and sufficient vitality to conduct the disease/purification process When such sufficient vitality is waning, organic tissue damage occurs from the extraordinarily polluted internal state of the body which creates the foundation for chronic disease. So, long as our body is relatively pure, however, waste materials do not accumulate and the scavenging assistance of bacterial germs is not called upon. Physicians say that our resistance against germs is our only protection to avoid disease, but they leave their patients ignorant of how to guarantee a high degree of resistance at all times We are told that germs invade only when resistance is lost. But what causes a loss of resistance? Obviously, loss of health means diminished resistance. So, if health is the best protection against disease, why not pro-mote health by educating the populace in the requisites of health according to their biological mandate? Why not create a true "healthcare" system, instead of the prevailing "disease care" system that currently exists? We must promote health by living life according to those factors upon which health is generated.
NOTE: I recommend everyone read this article in its entirety. The following topics are covered in the FULL article.
• The Viral Theory of Disease Causation
• "Live Viruses" are Always Dead
• The Mitochondria Connection
• “Viruses" Are Not Micro-organisms
• Obligate Reproduction
• Viruses Are Toxic Only as Accumulated Wastes
• Avoid "Infections" Through Healthful Living
• Drugs Are Counterproductive
• The Illusion of Contagion
• What's Really Going on Here?
• The Actual "Contagious" Factors and Influences
• "Susceptibility" Revisited
• And How About Our True "Epidemics"?
• The Bottom Line
Howard Hencke, in his 1995 book The Germ Theory: A Deliberate Aberration, notes that it was critical for the new medical industry.
"... to indoctrinate the public in the Western world with the belief that the salvation from all, especially physical ailments, lay outside the individual's system and responsibility, because it was caused by external factors...and that chemical remedies (drugs) will keep him free from disease, independent of his own vigilant responsibility."
"Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur's germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity."
- E. Douglas Hume
"Bacteria and parasites cannot cause disease processes unless they find their own peculiar morbid soil in which to grow and multiply."
-Henry Lindlahr, MD - Founder of Lindlahr Sanitarium
When once you interfere with the order of nature, there is no knowing where the results will end.
- Herbert Spencer
On his death bed Louis Pasteur said "Bernard was correct. I was wrong. The microbe (germ) is nothing. The terrain (milieu) is everything."
There are many variations of this recant. But the essential admission is intact. Bernard was Claude Bernard, who got the terrain theory from Antoine Béchamp (who called it the cellular theory).
Bechamp was one of France's most prominent and active researchers and biologists. He taught in universities and medical schools, and published widely on cell biology, disease, botany and related subjects. His would probably be a household name today if it wasn't for the activities of one Louis
Pasteur, who history has treated very kindly indeed, considering his fake science, his tendency to steal ideas (mainly from Bechamp), falsify experimental data, and in general make claims which had no basis in fact.
I'm not running off at the mouth by saying the above. It's all quite well documented - Bechamp and Pasteur were both members of the French Academy of Sciences, and the papers they submitted, and their correspondence, both to each other and to other people, were all recorded. Even their verbal exchanges survive in the minutes of the meetings.
To cut a long story short, and it is a long story, Pasteur basically dug up the germ theory of disease and put his name on it. It wasn't a new idea, although he claimed to have "discovered" germs all the same. The concept was actually outlined by other people many years before, but of course, the whole idea is wrong anyway, so it hardly matters who thought of it first. In a few years, the germ theory of disease will out there with the flat earth theory where it belongs.
Bechamp wrote several books. The last of these was The Third Element of the Blood, which outlines his hassles with Pasteur, also, the details of his own theories.
Another good book is Pasteur Exposed, written by Ethel Hume and first published in 1923, which goes into all the details of exactly how Bechamp's ideas were twisted beyond recognition by Pasteur. None of this would matter a toss, of course, except for the minor point that western chemistry-based medicine is built on a foundation of unquestioning "Pasteurism".
Normally nothing is introduced into the bloodstream without going through the laboratory of the entire digestive system. That is how nature protects the blood from external intrusions. Here are just a few of the hundreds of researchers opposing inoculation:
"The most serious disorders may be provoked by the injection of living organisms into the blood...into a medium not intended for them may provoke redoubtable manifestations of the gravest morbid phenomena."
A medical doctor reporting from the battlefields of South Africa during the Boer War in the early part of this century, Walter Hadwen, MD, in his book Microbes and War notes that the war itself killed 86,000 men. With a 100% inoculation rate, there were an additional 96,000 casualties from disease alone!
In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that "Pasteur had created a new form of disease."
We should understand that it was Pasteur who began the fashion of studying artificial disease conditions: "inducing sickness by morbid injections in human and animal subjects, instead of studying naturally diseased subjects."
Some 17 years before Pasteur, the most famous nurse in history, Florence Nightengale, put it like this:
"Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another. The specific disease is the grand refuge of the weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession.
There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions."
“The germ theory is false, and that illness is practically always due to errors of diet or manner of living, the germs being present solely as scavengers of dead and waste tissues and foods, and not as the cause of the disease. However, the erroneous belief that germs cause disease and must be controlled or eliminated before it can be cured is so widespread as to close the minds of many people to any other ideas on this subject It seems appropriate to go over the subject in order to show the truth regarding the falsity of Pasteur’s ideas and claims to fame,
and the fraudulent basis on which the germ theory rests, as was so well shown by Ms Hume in Béchamp or Pasteur? and to add other facts and statistics that support the idea that the germ theory is false,
in the hopes that it may receive wider circulation and more general attention, and possibly lead to a complete overhauling of the question
of the treatment of disease, especially regarding serology”.
Source: Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter the Germ Theory Exploded by R. B. Pearson First published in 1942
If you explore the history of the medical profession and the various ideas regarding the cause of disease that were held by leading physicians
before Pasteur first promulgated his notorious ‘germ theory’, you will find convincing evidence that Pasteur discovered nothing, and that he deliberately appropriated, falsified and perverted another man’s work.
The ‘germ theory’, so-called, long antedated Pasteur – so long, in fact, that he was able to present it as new and he got away with it! Leenwenhoek’s observations were purely objective and in striking contrast with the speculative views of M. A. Plenciz, a Viennese physician, who in 1762 published a germ theory of infectious diseases. Plenciz maintained that there was a special organism by which each infectious disease was produced, that micro-organisms were capable of reproduction
outside of the body, and that they might be conveyed from place to place by the air.”
Here is Pasteur’s great thought in total – his complete germ theory – and yet put in print over a century before Pasteur ‘thought of it’, and
published it as his own!
The world-famous English nurse, Florence Nightingale, published an attack on the idea in 1860, over 17 years before Pasteur adopted it and claimed it as his own.
She said of ‘infection’ 1 :
“Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions, growing out of one another. Is it not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against
the conditions in which we have placed ourselves? I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog. Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled
with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been ‘caught’, but must have begun. I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and turn into one another. Now, dogs do not turn into cats. I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut.
Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon disease in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):
– True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defense a true nurse either asks or needs. – Wise and humane management of the patient is the best
safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness. – The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions.”
1. Notes on Nursing, 1st ed., 1860, p.32 The Prior History of the ‘Germ Theory’ 13Here you have Florence Nightingale, the most famous nurse in history, after life-long experience with infection, contagion and epidemics, challenging the germ theory 17 years before Pasteur put it forward as his own discovery! (See Chapter 8, p.50).
She clearly understood it and its utter fallacy better before 1860 than Pasteur did, either in 1878 or later! Now, to see what a parasite Pasteur was on men who did things, let us digress and go back a few years, to the time when the study of germs was an outgrowth of the study of fermentation.
Hence it seems appropriate to go over the subject in order to show the truth regarding the falsity of Pasteur’s ideas and claims to fame, and the fraudulent basis on which the germ theory rests, as was so well shown by Miss Hume in Bechamp or Pasteur?, and to add other facts and statistics that support the idea that the germ theory is false, in the hopes that it may receive wider circulation and more general attention, and possibly lead to a complete overhauling of the question of the treatment of disease, especially regarding serology. Students memorize that Louis Pasteur “discovered” the Germ Theory. Not only is this not accurate, and not only is the Germ Theory itself unsubstantiated even today, but Pasteur himself in one of the most quoted deathbed statements perhaps of all time, recanted the Theory and admitted that his rivals had been right, and that it was not the germ that caused the disease, but rather the environment in which the germ was found: “Bernard acail raison; le terrain c’est tout, le germe c’est rien.”
As far as his Germ Theory goes, there was much opposition to it among many researchers of his own time. In a lecture given in London on 25 May 1911, M.L. Leverson, MD stated: "The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs." Also from the top medical journal Lancet, 29 Mar 1909, we find: "Koch's Postulates are rarely, if ever, complied with." The discoverer of the cell theory, Rudolf Virchow, with respect to the Germ Theory, commented simply: "Germs seek their natural habitat - diseased tissue - rather than being the cause of diseased tissue."
- Bieler, p 40
Antoine Bechamp, from whose research Pasteur plagiarized whatever he thought was useful, came up with an interesting point of view that has never been refuted. Bechamp discovered tiny organisms he called "microzymas" which are present in all things - animal, vegetable, and mineral, whether living or dead. Depending upon the condition of the host, these microzymas could assume various forms. Bad bacteria and viruses were simply the forms assumed by the microzymas when there was a condition of disease. In a diseased body, the microzymas became pathological bacteria and viruses. In a healthy body, microzymas formed healthy cells. When a plant or animal died, the microzymas lived on. To this day, the whole theory of microzymas has never been disproved.
Later researchers like Naessens and Enderlein followed the same line of reasoning and developed their own systems of how these microzymas operate. Although their ideas were never proven false by opposing research, they were generally persecuted by mainstream medicine, which makes sense. Because without an enemy that can be identified and killed, what good is it to develop weapons? And developing weapons, that is, drugs, has been the agenda of the industry set up by Carnegie and Rockefeller even down to the present day, as we shall see. New drugs mean new research funding and government money and the need for prescriptions and for an entire profession to write those prescriptions.
A Brief Criticism of Pasteur
In a 250-page thesis on Antoine Béchamp, Marie Nonclercq, doctor of pharmacy, explains the clear advantage that Pasteur had over Béchamp: "He was a falsifier of experiments and their results, where he wanted the outcomes to be favourable to his initial ideas. The falsifications committed by Pasteur now seem incredible to us. On deeper examination, however, the facts were in opposition to the ideas developed by Pasteur in the domain of bacteriology . . . Pasteur willfully ignored the work of Béchamp, one of the greatest 19th-century French scientists whose considerable work in the fields of chemical synthesis, bio-chemistry and infectious pathology is almost totally unrecognized today, because it had been systematically falsified, denigrated, for the personal profit of an illustrious personage (Pasteur) who had, contrary to Béchamp, a genius for publicity and what today we call 'public relations . . .'"
A Brief Comparison of Pasteur's Germ Theory and Béchamp's Cellular Theory
I cannot fairly leave this subject without some explanation of Béchamp's theory. You can easily find on the internet people who ridicule Béchamp's theory without really understanding it. I want to counter them.
The germ theory states that the body is sterile and disease is caused by external germs (microbes). For Béchamp, microbes naturally exist in the body and it is the disease that reflects the deteriorated condition of the host and changes the function of the microbes. The terrain — the internal environment — in response to various forces, fosters the development of germs from within. To my thinking, the germ theory essentially blames the messenger.
This more detailed explanation is extracted from members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm#Pasteur.
GERM THEORY (PASTEUR)
CELLULAR THEORY (BÉCHAMP)
1. The body is sterile.
Microbes exist naturally in the body.
2. Disease arises from micro-organisms outside the body.
Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
3. Micro-organisms are generally to be guarded against.
These intracellular micro-organisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
4. The function of micro-organisms is constant.
The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
5. The shapes and colours of micro-organisms are constant.
Micro-organisms are pleomorphic (having many forms): they change their shapes and colors (shape-shift) to reflect the condition of the host.
6. Every disease is associated with a particular micro-organism.
Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
7. Micro-organisms are primary causal agents.
Disease results when microbes change form, function, and toxicity according to the terrain of the host. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
8. Disease can "strike" anybody.
Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
9. To prevent disease we have to "build defenses”.
To prevent diseases we have to create health.
New information refutes the germ theory:
(a) The body is not sterile: Bacteria and viruses have been found and identified in healthy people.
(b) A particular microbe does not cause a corresponding disease: The same bacteria and viruses that have been associated with disease have also been found in healthy people, where they apparently play a benevolent role.
So, what causes disease?
Disease results when microbes change form, function, and toxicity according to the terrain of the host. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
To prevent disease we have to create health.
Conclusion: After the detoxification process is complete, disease symptoms disappear and the organism again makes its energies amount for normal endeavors. Strength then returns to the extremities. The body, although debilitated from the effort made necessary by its toxic condition, regains its powers and functional vitality and recovers without treatment. When the healing crisis is completed, recovery begins.
This convinces me even more that the real cause of dis-ease today is toxicity, whether caused by metabolic waste, external toxins in chemicals ingested, by mouth, lungs, or absorption through the skin, these toxins are the cause of the DIS-EASE in the body! Hence; the theory, The Toxicity Theory of Dis-ease. We will be talking more about this “Germ Theory” of dis-ease this Sunday, April 23rd, on our G2Voice Broadcast: The Germ Theory is “fake science”. Tune is live at: 10 AM CST g2voice.is this Sunday!